Multi-millionaire set to win battle with villagers over plan to close historic pub in North York Moors

A multi-millionaire internet pioneer looks set to win a long-running battle with villagers over his plan to permanently close a historic pub, despite it having been recognised as an asset of community value.
The Plough has been derelict since 2011 and is a sorry sightThe Plough has been derelict since 2011 and is a sorry sight
The Plough has been derelict since 2011 and is a sorry sight

The North York Moors National Park Authority’s planning committee has been warned by planning officers it would be difficult to justify rejecting the latest proposals for the 238-year-old Plough Inn, at Fadmoor, near Helmsley, which is owned by Peter Wilkinson, who has a reported £390m fortune.

Since Mr Wilkinson closed the pub, which featured in the Michelin Guide, in 2011 citing a lack of trade, he has faced vociferous local opposition to schemes to find new uses for the building, including the proposal to convert and extend the premises and outbuildings to create two local occupancy homes and four holiday lets being considered next week.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Wilkinson, who has founded a succession of profitable companies and is responsible for the creation of more than 5,000 UK jobs, has repeatedly stressed the inn at Fadmoor was a loss-making venture.

But a group of local residents insist the pub could be turned into a thriving community-run venture, a claim that has been backed by those behind a successful such scheme in Hudswell, near Richmond.

Documents submitted by campaigners opposing the latest plans state that nine years ago the Plough Inn had a waiting list of up to six months for evening dining.

They also highlight that the inn was re-registered as an asset of community value by Ryedale District Council last year “after rigorous appraisal of the community’s plans which were supported by the authority”, some six years after it was first recognised for the status.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

One letter of objection states: “The Plough has deliberately and provocatively been left in a disgraceful condition: boarded up and with unsightly security fencing purposely intended to detract from the visual amenity of the village; it is an unsubtle attempt to influence the planning decision in favour of the applicant by the creation of an eyesore.”

Other objectors, Fadmoor residents Jarvis and Dorothy Browning, said they would “like to have our village back as to what it was before and everyone would benefit from it”, and the proposals represented “just another nail in the coffin” for the village.

However, Margaret Smyth, manager of the Royal Oak in nearby Gillamoor, which is also owned by Mr Wilkinson, said it was very unlikely the two villages could support two pubs, and the holiday let and local occupancy homes plan would bring jobs and housing to the local economy.

Cold Kirby resident Julie Bushell said: “If the Plough Inn was currently viable as a public house it would be running as one. No pub closes without good reason. Times have changed, along with social habits, people’s requirements and expectations.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In their report to next week’s meeting, planning officers said the pub’s closure of the pub may have affected other businesses in the village, but the proposal would provide much-needed local occupancy housing and contribute to the local economy through the holiday lets.

The report states: “Whilst officers fully understand the views of many residents at the passing of a well-loved and remembered local pub, the reality is that the village has not had the benefit of the Plough Inn for nearly a decade.

“There is an alternative facility within walking distance and in many villages where the nearest public house is a car journey away, community efforts have focused on providing a new pub facility in a building that is available for such a use.

“It is surprising that in view of the strength of feeling in this instance such a venture has not been pursued. The Plough Inn as it used to be cannot be brought back by a planning decision but is reliant on the owner’s intent. It is clear in this case that there is no wish to do so.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The report concludes with “strong advice” from officers that “a refusal of this application would be difficult to justify” as it would bring some community benefit and see the premises improved.

-----------------------

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected]. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor

Related topics: