Battle of Orgreave: MPs call for independent review of South Yorkshire Police's files

The 1984 Battle of Orgreave is one of the best-known flashpoints of the miners' strike.The 1984 Battle of Orgreave is one of the best-known flashpoints of the miners' strike.
The 1984 Battle of Orgreave is one of the best-known flashpoints of the miners' strike.
MPs have called for hundreds of unreleased files about the so-called Battle of Orgreave during the 1984 Miners' Strike to be independently reviewed.

The Commons' Home Affairs Select Committee says it has discovered that South Yorkshire Police (SYP) holds 94 boxes of material about the clashes outside the Rotherham coking plant, which is the best known flashpoint of the bitter dispute.Committee chair Yvette Cooper has written to Home Secretary Amber Rudd asking her to set up an independent review of the extensive archive held by the force.Ms Cooper said: "Coalfield communities need to know the truth about what happened at Orgreave."We have been pushing and pushing to uncover the documents and information that police forces hold on what happened."Now we have discovered there are hundreds of files on Orgreave that have never been released. Several forces have told us they have information and we are asking them further questions now."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In her letter, the Labour MP for for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford said that SYP had not completed its cataloguing of its Orgreave archive and this involved 782 files in 84 archive boxes.But she said the force said it had since located another 10 boxes.She said: "This is a far greater amount of material, by a significant margin, than has been identified as being held by any other public body and its scale clearly merits urgent attention."Ms Cooper said: "These files need urgently to be examined so that as much of this information as possible can now be published. But it has to be an independent review to have credibility - which is why we have asked the Home Secretary to set it up, so that as many files as possible can then be released."She said this material was not reviewed by the Home Office when it considered the matter in January 2017 and was not all examined by Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) when it reviewed whether to launch an investigation into police conduct at Orgreave.

The Battle of Orgreave saw 95 miners arrested at the coking plant, near Rotherham, after clashes with police which left 50 people injured. When the cases came to court, all were abandoned after it became clear that evidence provided by police was unreliable.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In 2015, the IPCC said it would “not be in the public interest” to launch a full investigation into claims police used excessive force against miners, had their statements manipulated and gave false evidence in court to justify spurious criminal charges.

A year later, the Home Secretary rejected calls for a statutory inquiry or independent review into Orgreave.

Exclusive: The links between South Yorkshire Police Hillsborough and Orgreave ‘cover-ups’ five years apartMs Rudd said she made the "difficult decision" because "ultimately there were no deaths or wrongful convictions" resulting from the events of 1984.That decision was greeted with dismay from campaigners who believe the truth about police action at the coking works has never come out and officers were politically directed by the Thatcher government.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In 2016, The Yorkshire Post revealed that previously censored documents showed the links between an alleged cover-up carried out by senior South Yorkshire Police officers at the time and the force’s actions five years later at Hillsborough.

South Yorkshire Police, which has faced calls to release any files it has relating to Orgreave, has its Miners’ Strike material stored at Sheffield City Archives and South Yorkshire Police’s headquarters at Carbrook House, Sheffield.Last year, Chief Constable Stephen Watson told The Yorkshire Post his force will control the way its archives on the 1984/5 Miners’ Strike are released to the public because he does not want to “just empty stuff onto the street and let people pick at it”.

He said: "I just want, if the public know about anything, you have got to see it in the full context, and it has got to be done effectively and professionally and in good faith."What I am not going to do in trying to achieve that, is find the force being pulled from pillar to post and spending an absolute fortune in dealing with these matters in an unstructured and un-thought through way."Mr Watson said: "In the absence of that, we have got some difficult judgements to come forward because what I am not prepared to do is just empty stuff onto the street and let people just pick at it."