Delayed trains

Ministers are, understandably, reluctant to sign off such a massive deal when budget restraints may prevent them from doing so in three months' time. This caution also contrasts with Labour's false promises and financial irresponsibility.

The 7.5bn contract, which involves the East Coast and Great Western routes, is further complicated by the fact that the line from King's Cross to Yorkshire and Scotland is in public ownership; there's no private train operator to help foot the bill following the demise of the GNER and National Express franchises.

However, despite the financial constraints, the coalition Government cannot continue delaying investment projects, such as new rolling stock that might have been constructed locally or the cash-strapped Building Schools for the Future programme, without impinging upon Britain's recovery prospects.

Thousands of livelihoods depended on these initiatives, and others, being advanced. They were also brought forward with the best of intentions. It is not conducive for children to be taught in dilapidated school buildings. And the reason that new trains are required is because existing rolling stock has become outdated and costly to maintain.

Ministers will point to their commitment to high-speed rail – and how this proposal will impact upon future budgets. But, while this is a valid point, this line is unlikely to be built for at least 15 years and the first phase may not benefit Yorkshire. And, in the meantime, passengers will have every right to expect improved trains on the East Coast commensurate with the increased fares that they are inevitably going to have to pay in the months and years ahead.

This is why Ministers must have a ready-made alternative plan in place

if they ditch the proposed East Coast trains deal.