Testing Gove

HIS timing may not be brilliant but, weeks before the latest A-level results are published, Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, does have a point. Britain would benefit in countless ways if the exams were more rigorous.

There is no doubting the hard work many pupils and teachers put in, but the present system, in which pupils take intermediate AS-levels in the first year of sixth form, is far from perfect. Young people will be best prepared for university, or the workplace, by in-depth study rather than "bitesize" learning.

Reform should be considered but a new way of doing things must limit disruption to pupils and staff. Thirteen years of Labour brought improved standards but also soaring bureaucracy and more accusations of grade inflation. It would be a real achievement if, after the introduction of some changes by the coalition, Westminster and Whitehall could leave teachers to get on with the job.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In considering education from the age of 16 upwards, Mr Gove should also look at some of the subjects being studied. It is clear that not all degree-level courses are sufficiently rigorous academically and there may be a case for re-considering some of the A-levels on offer.

A clear, demanding and serious A-level curriculum will help teachers, pupils and universities. In the long run, it will benefit businesses and the economy as well. There is nothing in itself wrong with reform but change cannot continue forever.