Captain Tom Foundation could close following spa pool block row, says lawyer

The Captain Tom Foundation could shut down, a family lawyer has stated at an appeal hearing against the demolition of a spa pool block at the home of the war veteran's daughter.

The charity, set up in May 2020 after Captain Sir Tom Moore's fundraising efforts in the first Covid-19 lockdown, is "unlikely to exist" in future, barrister Scott Stemp has said.

The foundation is currently the subject of an investigation by the charity watchdog, amid concerns about its management and independence from Sir Tom's family.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Charity Commission opened a case into the foundation shortly after the 100-year-old died in 2021, and launched its inquiry in June last year.

Hannah Ingram-Moore, the daughter of the late Captain Sir Tom Moore, with husband Colin (left) and son Benjie (right),   at Central Bedfordshire Council in Chicksands, Bedfordshire, for a hearing to appeal against an order to demolish an unauthorised spa pool block built at her home.Hannah Ingram-Moore, the daughter of the late Captain Sir Tom Moore, with husband Colin (left) and son Benjie (right),   at Central Bedfordshire Council in Chicksands, Bedfordshire, for a hearing to appeal against an order to demolish an unauthorised spa pool block built at her home.
Hannah Ingram-Moore, the daughter of the late Captain Sir Tom Moore, with husband Colin (left) and son Benjie (right), at Central Bedfordshire Council in Chicksands, Bedfordshire, for a hearing to appeal against an order to demolish an unauthorised spa pool block built at her home.

An indication of the foundation's future has now been given at a planning appeal hearing in the council chamber of Central Bedfordshire Council.

Mr Stemp, representing Captain Tom's daughter Hannah Ingram-Moore and her husband Colin, said: "It's not news to anybody that the (Captain Tom) foundation, it seems, is to be closed down following an investigation by the Charity Commission."

He added that in future the foundation was "unlikely to exist".

The commission's investigation is ongoing.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Sir Tom, born in Keighley, raised £38.9 million for the NHS by walking 100 laps of his garden before his 100th birthday at the height of the first national Covid-19 lockdown in April 2020.

He was knighted by the late Queen during a unique open-air ceremony at Windsor Castle in summer of that year.

He died in February 2021.

Last month, the charity's latest accounts stated that the commission's intervention into the foundation had had a "massive adverse impact" on fundraising.

The charity stated that its work is "entirely reliant on donations" and that while its total income had been just over £1 million for the 2021 financial year, that fell to £402,854 from June 2021 to November 2022.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This summer, the foundation stopped taking money from donors after council chiefs ordered that the unauthorised spa pool block should be demolished.

On Tuesday, the appeal hearing - attended by Ms Ingram-Moore, her husband and their son Benji, was told the facility could be used for rehabilitation sessions for the elderly.

Ms Ingram-Moore and her husband applied for planning permission in 2021 and an L-shaped building was given the green light, but the planning authority refused a subsequent retrospective application in 2022 for a larger C-shaped building containing a spa pool.

Central Bedfordshire Council said in July that an enforcement notice requiring the demolition of the "now-unauthorised building" was issued and a subsequent appeal against the demolition notice was made to the Planning Inspectorate.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

At the hearing chartered surveyor James Paynter, for the Ingram-Moore family, said the scheme had "evolved" to include the spa pool and that it has "the opportunity to offer rehabilitation sessions for elderly people in the area".

A document supporting the initial planning application for an L-shaped building said it was to be used partly "in connection with the Captain Tom Foundation and its charitable objectives".

Around half a dozen neighbours attended the meeting, with one arguing that the building is "49% bigger than what was consented" and is close to his property, adding: "It's very brutal."

A written decision is to be published at a later date, weeks after the one-day hearing.