Pregnant Yorkshire insurance worker sacked for looking at prams loses tribunal case

A pregnant insurance worker who spent time looking for prams at work and snooping on colleagues’ emails has lost an unfair dismissal claim after being sacked.

Paige Mowatt, who worked at Doncaster’s One Call Insurance, spent more than ten-and-a-half hours viewing non-work-related material over just 15 days, an employment tribunal heard

As well as researching baby-related products, she also carried out a "sustained and calculated" search of her colleagues' private messages, finding one from a manager which called her a 'muppet.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The tribunal said: "It was found that Miss Mowatt had accessed websites relating to the sale of prams and other children's items during working hours.

Paige Mowatt was sacked from Doncaster's One Call Insurance.Paige Mowatt was sacked from Doncaster's One Call Insurance.
Paige Mowatt was sacked from Doncaster's One Call Insurance.

"Miss Mowatt admitted to looking at websites for her personal purposes and using her WhatsApp account for personal messages during working hours.

"She was not sure of the time she looked at the various websites, but stated that they could have been during her breaks."

A disciplinary investigation was launched, during which she admitted to checking the emails of colleagues, including managers, and adding inboxes to her own Outlook account.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Read More
Two horses die and driver injured after early morning crash

The tribunal said: "Miss Mowatt explained that she had started this from just before she stepped down as manager as she felt she was being left out of things such as emails and WhatsApp groups."

The tribunal heard many of the emails she viewed had nothing to do with her and included return to work after sickness documents from other members of staff.

The panel found: "She had not searched for herself in the emails by name but was conducting a general browsing where she did not appear to be looking for anything specific."

She was fired but later sued One Call for victimisation and unfair dismissal.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Employment Judge Neil Maidment said: "Miss Mowatt's viewing of colleagues' emails was calculated, sustained and extremely wide ranging involving her not simply in searching for references to herself but viewing correspondence which had nothing whatsoever to do with her and which in some cases was of a private nature.

"One Call Insurance did not act outside the band of reasonable responses in considering that there was such a loss of faith and trust in Miss Mowatt that it could no longer sustain her employment."

Related topics: