Widow of former Yorkshire MP says there hasn't been 'much justice' for those investigated in bungled VIP abuse probe

Public figures caught up in a disastrous investigation into false claims of a VIP paedophile ring have still not received justice, one of their widows has said.

Lady Diana Brittan, the widow of former Richmond MP Leon Brittan, giving evidence to the Commons Home Affairs Committee

Lady Diana Brittan was given compensation and an official apology from the Metropolitan Police after her home was raided in 2015 as part of Operation Midland amid allegations against her late husband.

The doomed 16-month investigation, sparked by false accounts given by fantasist Carl Beech, saw raids on the homes of former home secretary and Richmond MP Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Operation Midland ended in 2016 without a single arrest, after Beech made a series of lurid claims, all later proved to be untrue, including three murders.

Lord Brittan, the former Richmond MP and home secretary

Lady Brittan told the Home Affairs Select Committee: “I perfectly accept that the (Met Police) Commissioner came and offered me a very fulsome apology. But in the end there are issues at the back of all of this as far as the moral compass of the police is concerned which I think have not been addressed.

“I just feel that all these years on, and particularly for the family of Lord Bramall, because after all he has died, there hasn’t been much justice.”

The Metropolitan Police was heavily criticised for having believed Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence including naming witnesses that did not exist.

Lady Brittan told the committee: “I find it quite extraordinary when you look at the unfolding of the events, in a funny way that anybody could have believed any of it at the very beginning.

“If you look at those who were accused, the fact that they were busy people at the top of their tree, and yet they were accused of finding time to have two hours off every afternoon doing what they shouldn’t be doing.

“I come to the view that none of the things that should have been done in order to try and test the evidence the other way were done.”

One of the most serious accusations levelled at investigators was that they allegedly misled a district judge when applying for search warrants.

An independent review into the case by former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques claimed that the judge had been knowingly misled.

Despite this, police watchdog the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) cleared the five officers involved in the application of any wrongdoing.

Lady Brittan, who was a magistrate for 26 years, told the committee that the warrants had been used as “a fishing expedition”.

She said: “Of all the things that went horribly wrong in that particular inquiry was the application for search warrants. In my view at the time, because I’ve signed search warrants in the past, it was a fishing expedition, and that’s really not what you’re allowed to do with search warrants.”

The 80-year-old, whose home was searched six weeks after her husband died, added: “It is the greatest invasion of your privacy and in fact in the end it is a trespass on your property. This makes search warrants such an important part of the legal process.

“In this case I just didn’t feel that particular aspect and the terrible consequences of what a search does to the people concerned, and indeed to the subsequent press coverage, that wasn’t taken into account at all.”

Lord Brittan was investigated under Operation Midland as well as a second allegation, Operation Vincente, that he had raped a 19-year-old woman in 1967.

Lady Brittan was later told that there would have been no case to answer for her late husband under either investigation.

She said that the police complaints process was “unbelievably opaque”, and that the IOPC lacked teeth.

She said: “It discourages people to make complaints if the system is so opaque that you really don’t know what you’re going to get out of it and what you’re going to put yourself through.

“It really has to be able to say we have teeth which we can use, because if you don’t have teeth what is to stop the organisation which you’re regulating just going on as it has gone on because nobody really will ever hold it to account.”