Extinction Rebellion wins High Court challenge against Met Police over protest ban

Extinction Rebellion has won a High Court challenge against the Metropolitan Police over a London-wide protest ban.
By Jonathan Pritchard
Published 6th Nov 2019, 10:52 BST

The force imposed a blanket ban across the capital last month, prohibiting any assembly of more than two people linked to XR's Autumn Uprising action.

A number of protesters from Yorkshire had travelled down to the capital city to take part in the action. Police from the region were also sent to London to help deal with the protests.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But two senior judges ruled the decision to impose the ban, made under Section 14 of the Public Order Act, was "unlawful".

Extinction Rebellion protesters chained together as they block the road outside Westminster Abbey on October 7, 2019 in London, England. Climate change activists gathered to block access to various government departments as they start a two week protest in central London Credit:Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty ImagesExtinction Rebellion protesters chained together as they block the road outside Westminster Abbey on October 7, 2019 in London, England. Climate change activists gathered to block access to various government departments as they start a two week protest in central London Credit:Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images
Extinction Rebellion protesters chained together as they block the road outside Westminster Abbey on October 7, 2019 in London, England. Climate change activists gathered to block access to various government departments as they start a two week protest in central London Credit:Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images

Announcing their judgement in London on Tuesday, Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr Justice Chamberlain said the Met had no power to impose the ban because the Act does not cover "separate assemblies".

Lord Justice Dingemans said: "Separate gatherings, separated both in time and by many miles, even if coordinated under the umbrella of one body, are not a public assembly within the meaning of ... the Act.

"The XR Autumn Uprising intended to be held from October 14 to 19 was not therefore a public assembly ... therefore the decision to impose the condition was unlawful because there was no power to impose it under ... the Act."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, the judges noted there are powers within the Act which may be used lawfully to "control future protests which are deliberately designed to 'take police resources to breaking point'" - one of XR's stated aims.

Yorkshire protesters join Extinction Rebellion as they shut down roads around Westminster

Extinction Rebellion protest at York council meetingIn 10 days of protests to call for urgent action on climate change and wildlife losses, which started on October 7, XR activists shut down areas around Parliament and the Bank of England, and targeted London City Airport and Government departments.

The Met used Section 14 of the Public Order Act initially to restrict the protest action to Trafalgar Square, but following "continued breaches" of the order officers moved in to clear the area.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The force said 1,832 people were arrested during the protests, and more than 150 were charged with offences.

Those bringing the legal action include Green Party politicians Baroness Jenny Jones and Caroline Lucas MP, Labour MP Clive Lewis and campaigner and journalist George Monbiot - who was arrested after the ban came into force.

XR's tactics are to cause "maximum disruption" and to overwhelm the capacity in police custody, including by refusing bail after being arrested.

The court heard the costs of policing the Autumn Uprising were in excess of £20 million.

Related topics:Met PoliceLondonHigh CourtExtinction RebellionPolice