Inspector throws out plan to build First Homes on grazing field in East Yorkshire village
Proposals to build the affordable homes on grazing land next to Grade I-listed St Nicholas Church, in Keyingham, were refused by East Riding Council last May. Developer Kevin Thompson went to appeal.
There were 378 objections to the plans, which included six bungalows, with just 17 in support.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdOne objector said their home had looked over the field since 1840. They said: “Our grandchildren have enjoyed seeing bovine animals happily grazing, which I feel certain is the case for many hundreds of other village residents.


"Any development would see the loss of an important amenity not only for the village but for all those commuters who pass through on a daily basis and indeed those who visit this lovely area for their holidays.”
First Homes launched in 2021 to help local first-time buyers and key workers onto the property ladder.
They have to be discounted by a minimum 30 per cent against market value and sold at a maximum price of £250,000.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe properties have to remain First Homes in perpetuity. Inspector A Edgington said building on the long, narrow field alongside Church Lane “would have a significant urbanising effect on the edge of Keyingham”.
The inspector also backed concerns about the lack of room for vehicles to manouevre saying the proposed layout was “cramped” and bin lorries would have to reverse in or out of Church Lane.
A legal agreement would be needed to ensure delivery of First Homes and the council’s housing team had said there had been “low demand for bungalows and the appellant has not provided any evidence that bungalows are needed in this location”.
The inspector said: “Consequently, as there is no mechanism to ensure that the proposals would provide any First Homes, I give no weight to the benefits arising from the provision of affordable housing.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe inspector concluded: “The proposals would conflict with the Act, the local development plan, the Framework and European legislation with regard to biodiversity and there are no material considerations of such weight to lead me to conclude other than that the appeal should be dismissed.”
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.