Gavin Williamson must go; all seven Nolan standards on public life have been broken – The Yorkshire Post says

It also suggests that the Seven Principles of Public Life – the code of conduct that all holders of public office are required to uphold – are now irrelevant to Ministers.

Just how can the Education Secretary command confidence when he effectively finds himself in breach of all seven of the so-called Nolan tests after his U-turn on the grading of exams, and then a series of interviews which exposed his lack of leadership.

This is the context which makes Mr Williamson’s failure to resign, and Boris Johnson’s reluctance to sack this enfeebled Minister, all the more unforgivable as William Hague, a Tory grandee, warns of “striking parallels” with the ‘poll tax’ furore of the 1980s.

Selflessness: This requires holders of public office to “act solely in terms of the public interest” – a notion at odds with Mr Williamson’s failure to ensure that the algorithm used by exam regulator Ofqual to award grades was fair to all.

Integrity: The Minister contends that he only became aware of the scale of the problem on Saturday night. Yet the cross-party Education Select Committee reported last month that “calculated grades” risked penalising “disadvantaged pupils”. Did he not read the critique?

Objectivity: Public office holders are required to take decisions impartially “using the best evidence”. The fact that Mr Williamson did not appear to sufficiently challenge Ofqual to test its algorithm is a prima facie breach.

Accountability: To be fair, it’s not Mr Williamson’s fault that Parliament is in recess. But the Education Secretary is responsible for the DfE’s wall of silence between Saturday morning, and the U-turn on Monday teatime, that caused so much angst. Now it emerges that he’s left universities to sort out his mess.

Openness: This says ‘information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing’. Yet Mr Williamson failed to act when the Education Select Committee called on Ofqual “to make a transparency guarantee”.

Honesty: This says “holders of public office should be truthful”. Yet this, too, is open to question when Mr Williamson was so evasive about whether Ofqual still had his confidence and whether he had offered to resign.

Leadership: As well as requiring public servants to lead by example, it requires them to “challenge poor behaviour” and “robustly support” the Nolan principles. Irrespective of the level of culpability at the DfE and Ofqual, Mr Williamson has demonstrated none of these qualities.

Sacked as Defence Secretary by Theresa May in a rare act of decisiveness on the former PM’s part, Mr Williamson was fortunate to be given a second chance by her successor – this appointment smacked of nepotism rather than any suitability for high office.

Yet it is not just on exams that Mr Williamson has failed; his own ‘school report’ would be just as damning if the seven tests were applied separately to the reopening of schools or his response to the North-South attainment divide.

And this matters because the post of Education Secretary should be one of the most important public offices of all – its decisions are fundamental to the futures of all young people and, in turn, their ability to forge successful careers for Britain’s benefit.

However the fact that Scarborough-born Mr Williamson is the fifth Education Secretary in a decade – and 11th since the turn of the Millennium when Labour was in power – points to successive premiers not making the right appointments to ensure any continuity. Every change represents another disruptive upheaval.

In this respect, Boris Johnson can begin to make amends by subjecting all potential successors to a rigorous interview process to assess their suitability rather than making an appointment on a whim. Their ability to lead, manage and inspire – traits that Mr Williamson has time and again shown to be without – now need to guide the PM if the Nolan principles are to remain relevant to public life.

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected]. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor