Kevin Hollinrake: Please stop shortchanging North Yorkshire

I AM a former businessman, and fairness was a guiding principle of my business career. Like many of my colleagues, I stood on a platform of getting a fairer deal for our rural areas. They do not get a fair deal today.
Thirsk and Malton MP Kevin Hollinrake.Thirsk and Malton MP Kevin Hollinrake.
Thirsk and Malton MP Kevin Hollinrake.

The latest provisional settlement is the opposite of fair. In effect, there will be a 37 per cent reduction in North Yorkshire County Council’s budget, versus an average reduction for metropolitan areas of 19 per cent.

Compared with what would happen under a flat-rate reduction, counties across the UK will be £161m worse
off in cash terms in 2016-17, while metropolitan authorities will be £73m better off. That is a massive redistribution. In effect, council tax increases in my constituency and others like mine will be supporting London and metropolitan areas.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

North Yorkshire County Council is 
one of the biggest losers, on the back of what is already a bad deal. A band D taxpayer in North Yorkshire pays about £1,430 a year, whereas one in Westminster pays £670 a year. Nationally people in rural areas pay about £81 a year more in council tax, but get about £130 less in their settlement funding allocation. We pay more, we earn less and we get fewer services.

Services are harder to deliver in rural areas. We have many bus passes in Thirsk and Malton, but very few buses because it is so difficult to provide buses on a commercial basis and it is getting more challenging to do so. All we are asking for is a fair deal.

We welcomed the increase in the Rural Services Delivery Grant to £65m a year, but that is back-loaded. Effectively, in 2016-17 it will deliver only about £4.5m. The gap is widening, not narrowing. That is happening on the back of other areas where we do not get a fair deal, be it healthcare or schools, although huge progress has been made to remedy that situation.

This debate is not about the size of the cake. Local authorities need to share the burden of balancing the books. Governments of both colours have run deficits for 28 of the past 34 years.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

We are still running a deficit this year of about £75bn. We need to make cuts. The challenges ahead will be about increasing social security budgets. Sixty years ago, social security accounted for 11 per cent of spending. It now accounts for 28 per cent. Health spending has gone from seven per cent of spending to 18 per cent. Those issues are particularly profound in rural areas. We know that we need to make cuts. There is no alternative that will balance the books.

This debate is not about the size of the cake, but about how the cake is divided. North Yorkshire expected a flat-rate cut, which would have meant a 27 per cent reduction.

That is a challenging reduction. In the words of the council’s chief executive Richard Flinton, it would be “tough but understandable”. The proposed 37 per cent reduction, which amounts to £23.7m, is £6.9m worse than a flat-rate reduction.

The social care precept on the council tax will raise only £4.8m, so we will be £2m worse off, and that money is supposed to help our adult social care – another very profound issue in my constituency, which has seen huge increases in the elderly population. There will be a 20 per cent increase in the number of over-65s and a 50 per cent increase in the number of over-95s in the next five years.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

We need to make sure that we get
 a fair deal. Of course, local authorities need to play their part in that. They need to develop greater synergies and more efficiencies.

In the area covered by North Yorkshire County Council, there are nine local authorities. I do not know how sustainable that number is in the longer term. I fully support reorganisation.

At a time when we are losing services, local government must be more efficient.

One could say that local authorities should use their reserves, but many of those reserves are committed, particularly to flooding schemes, for which we have seen an increased need in my area over the past few weeks, and to supporting the roll-out of broadband, improving our roads and filling in potholes.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

There is a feeling among my constituents that we are not getting
a fair deal, so I call on Ministers to revise the proposal to ensure that there is fairness for people in both urban and rural areas.

Kevin Hollinrake is the Conservative MP for Thirsk and Malton who spoke in a Commons debate on rural funding. This is an edited version.