Leaseholders stuck in cladding disputes face 'very miserable Christmas', Yorkshire MP claims

Leaseholders stuck in properties covered in dangerous cladding systems face a “very miserable Christmas” if the Government does not agree to cover the costs of remedial works to make properties safe, a Yorkshire MP has said.

After the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017 in which 72 people were killed it was pledged that the safe alternatives to cladding would be provided on all buildings in England taller than 18 metres by last June.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But a report in September found just 155 out of 455 high-rise buildings with similar cladding to Grenfell have had remedial work fully completed.

And scores of leaseholders are now stuck in tense negotiations with owners and developers over who should foot the high costs, while in the meantime shelling out for expensive 'waking watches' - 24-hour fire marshals - to keep residents safe.

Clive Betts. Photo: JPI MediaClive Betts. Photo: JPI Media
Clive Betts. Photo: JPI Media

Owners of flats in a dozen buildings in and around Leeds were reported to be paying up to £400 a month each for 24-hour fire marshalls as an interim measure to avoid being evicted, after West Yorkshire Fire Service inspectors found their buildings were unsafe.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Clive Betts, Labour chairman of the Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee and Sheffield South East MP, told the House of Commons that the £1.6bn which had been made available by the Government to help those who could not pay for remedial work was “totally inadequate”.

He said: “If leaseholders are not going to pay, and I hope the minister will confirm that, I accept that he should pursue developers and freeholders and others.

“But, in the meantime, if developers have gone out of business or are refusing to pay, does he accept that at least in the interim the Government is going to have to step in and fund all the costs?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“If he accepts that, then does he accept that the £1.6 billion so far made available to remove dangerous cladding will be totally inadequate?

“The select committee heard that to make all high-rise buildings totally safe and remove all defects the total bill could be as high as £15bn, and leaseholders should not have to pay that.

“Does he accept that without assurances on these points many people are going to have a very miserable Christmas trapped in properties they can’t sell, properties they often can’t insure, trapped in properties where they’re having to pay for waking watches and wondering how on earth they are going to pay the bills that could arrive on their doormat at any time?”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But Housing Minister Chris Pincher said the Government “cannot write an open cheque” to prevent all leaseholders from having to pay some of the costs.

Mr Pincher told the Commons: “The point of introducing £1.6bn of public money is to make sure that in those buildings which are most at risk and where there is no means to pay, the state does step in and support those leaseholders.

“But, fundamentally, we expect developers, owners, to step up and execute their responsibility to pay where buildings have been defective.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I cannot say that there will not be some costs at some point related to some defect in historic building safety that will not fall upon the leaseholder.

“But we want to make sure through the public money that we are spending and also through the work of (Government expert) Michael Wade that we find innovative solutions to make sure that such costs as minimal as possible.

“Because we cannot write an open cheque on behalf of the taxpayer, that would send the wrong signal to developers and those who are responsible for these buildings.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But MPs told Mr Pincher that many owners and developers were simply not addressing the problem, leaving leaseholders stuck.

Conservative MP Nickie Aiken (Cities of London and Westminster) said it is “inexcusable” that many building owners are still trying to “pass the buck” to leaseholders.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.