Man who built house using rubber tyres could face court over 'wilful disregard' of planning rules

A councillor says members of his committee want to see a swift resolution to proceedings against an East Cleveland builder who is accused of a “wilful disregard” for planning regulations.

Councillor Stuart Smith, who is chairman of Redcar and Cleveland Council’s regulatory committee, said a “speedy result” was required in respect of action being taken against Malcolm Hughlock, from Boosbeck.

Mr Hughlock has so far failed to comply with the planning authority’s demand that he take down the balcony of a house he built in Serenity Hollow, Boosbeck.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The two-storey modular property, which contains rubber tyres in its foundations, was granted retrospective planning permission on condition that the balcony, which overlooks a bungalow, be removed.

Mr Hughlock has so far failed to comply with the planning authority’s demand that he take down the balcony of a house he built in Serenity Hollow, Boosbeck.Mr Hughlock has so far failed to comply with the planning authority’s demand that he take down the balcony of a house he built in Serenity Hollow, Boosbeck.
Mr Hughlock has so far failed to comply with the planning authority’s demand that he take down the balcony of a house he built in Serenity Hollow, Boosbeck.

Mr Hughlock subsequently received a breach of condition notice from the council which could result in him being summoned to magistrates court.

Earlier this month the 69-year-old said he had been in touch with the council to suggest a modification to the balcony, which he did not want to take down.

Read More
Scarborough residents stunned after 'mini-tornado' tears through Eastfield and r...

He said: “The original design was award winning and if you take the balcony down it loses something big – it is just for looks, not to use. Take the balcony off and it becomes a square box.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The council’s development services manager Claire Griffiths told a meeting of the regulatory committee that she “very much doubted” the notice would be complied with.

Asked by Councillor Anne Watts what the planning authority’s next move would be, Mrs Griffiths said: “We put a pack to [the] legal [department] to take him to court over non-compliance.

“It’s a breach of condition notice that we’ve served. When [the development] was granted there was a condition that the balcony be removed by a certain date which hasn’t been complied with.”

Coun Smith said: “The committee would like to see a speedy result in relation to this.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If Mr Hughlock is prosecuted, those proceedings will take precedence and could lead, for example, to a fine.

The council will then be left to decide what action it chooses to take in respect of the property.