Yorkshire woman whose fare evasion case being examined will ‘never get on a train again'
Sarah Cook's case is one of six "test cases" of fare evasion prosecutions being looked into at Westminster Magistrates' Court by Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring - who said about 75,000 cases are believed to have been involved.
He said a letter was sent to those involved in the test cases explaining the process used was "probably unlawful".
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe train firms involved - including Northern Rail and Greater Anglia - prosecuted alleged fare evaders under a system which allows certain offences to be prosecuted in private rather than in open court, known as the single justice procedure (SJP). In 2016, train operating companies were given powers to prosecute alleged offenders under the SJP.
But a number of these cases against alleged fare evaders have been brought under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 - which is not allowed in the SJP, the Evening Standard has previously reported.
In a hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday, Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring said his initial view was that "all of the offences which were not covered by (the) 2016 order but prosecuted under SJP process are void".
Ms Cook, from Barnsley , said she tried to appeal after being fined for not producing a ticket following her train journey from Wombwell to Barnsley on November 17, 2022.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe 40-year-old said the ticket machine would not accept her card for the fare and as she had not been on a train in decades believed she could buy a ticket once on the train.
But when she got off one stop later and was asked to show a ticket, she said she was told she had to pay a fine.
"I haven't got on the train for about 20 years," Ms Cook said. "I ran across, the machine wouldn't accept my card to pay, then the train came and I thought it doesn't matter, I'll buy a ticket on the train. Nobody came, and when I went to get off people were checking their phones for tickets and I said 'I don't have a ticket, I need a return', they said 'if you're already travelling we have to fine you'.
"I said 'I wasn't actually evading it, I thought I would get one on the train', they said 'it's too late you should have got a promise to pay'. I gave all my details and she said 'you can appeal it, it's a £20 fine', the journey is about £3.50."
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMs Cook said she wrote an email to appeal but then got letters saying she should have attended a court case and was being fined £475 by Northern Rail. She said she later agreed to pay £4.
Ms Cook received a letter on Wednesday informing her that she was one of a number of test cases being brought before Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday. The pet shop owner said she believed the letter was "a scam" as she was confused and thought it meant her case was not resolved.
"The whole thing has been a palaver," she added. "It was always in my mind that I'm a business owner, I'm a good person. For what the crime was, it seemed very blown out of proportion for a less than £4 train journey. It was an appointment to see my accountant. I did get the train that one time and probably never again as a result."
A spokesperson for DfT OLR Holdings Limited (DOHL), which is a holding company established by the Department for Transport which owns Northern Rail, said DOHL train operators stopped using the single justice procedure for offences under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 in January and are reviewing its previous use.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAnd a Greater Anglia spokesperson said it stopped progressing fare evasion cases under the Regulation of Railways Act via the single justice procedure in March 2024 and is reviewing previous cases and "any associated implications".
Another hearing will take place at the same court next month. Northern Rail has been approached to comment.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.