Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Charles Stanley Logo
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Cash crisis will turn Yorkshire into 'rail museum'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 October 2007
YORKSHIRE'S railways will become "a museum of older rolling stock", threatening the safety of passengers and causing long delays because of a crippling lack of Government investment, it is claimed.
The Yorkshire Post can reveal new locomotives being brought in by National Express, which is taking over east coast mainline services from GNER in December, are older, slower and less green than those already running.

Roy Wicks, director general of the South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive, has criticised the lack of investment in the region's rail services and said Yorkshire is "quickly becoming a museum of older rolling stock on the Northern franchises".

There is a deep sense of disappointment in Yorkshire that the Government overlooked the region's needs in this summer's long-term vision for the rail network, which will see billions of pounds pumped into two new London lines – the north-south Thameslink and east-west Crossrail.

Hull Trains, which also runs services into London, has been forced to hire a vintage engine – introduced in 1965, withdrawn from service at the turn of the millennium and preserved by rail enthusiasts – with no alternative available to replace a damaged locomotive.

And despite seeing a huge increase in its number of passengers, Northern Rail, which runs the majority of services between Yorkshire's towns and cities, was told when awarded its Government franchise that it would not receive new trains as it was not destined to grow.

Despite an acknowledgement that trains around Leeds will soon be the most crowded in the UK, there has only been a pledge to provide between 60 and 90 new carriages for the area by 2014, with a handful more for trains around Sheffield and those on the Trans-Pennine route to Manchester.

There was no mention of major infrastructure investment on the east coast mainline, which Network Rail believes essential to reducing overcrowding and keeping ticket prices down, only a promise the line would get a trial batch of new Intercity trains in 2012.

That has forced National Express – which is paying the Government £1.4bn up to 2015 for the line – to bring in diesel locomotives with a top speed of 110mph to run the extra services promised from 2010 on the electrified 125mph route between London and Yorkshire.

A National Express spokesman said: "The trains are diesel, yes, but as part of our engineering to make them as green as possible we're putting new engines in.

"We've promised 25 new services a day from 2010. At the moment there's a lot of competition for trains between the operators and these were the only ones available until the new Intercity Express trains come in 2012."

A similar problem befell Hull Trains, which has taken nine months to replace one of its four locomotives after it fell from jacks while undergoing maintenance, causing damage that will take two years to fix.

Managing director Mark Leving said that the company had no option but to take on a locomotive built in 1965 for weekend and Friday evening services.

He said: "Our biggest challenge has been to find a suitable alternative when there is simply no spare rolling stock available in the UK. This has made the issue very problematic to say the least."

The Yorkshire Post is running a Road to Ruin campaign, highlighting historic underspending on the region's transport infrastructure.

Despite only receiving £215 per person for road and rail in Yorkshire, compared with London's £615 per person, Transport Minister and Doncaster Central MP Rosie Winterton told Parliament this week that spending had risen 77 per cent in the region in the last six years.

But Mr Wicks said he was worried the Government's rail white paper carried too heavy a focus on London and only vague promises to increase rolling stock in the regions.

He said: "When you go down to London you'll see new trains everywhere. But the local services up here use old trains.

"The Government has promised 1,300 new carriages, most of them going to London. But we need to be at the front of the queue. If you look at growth in passenger numbers, it's greater here than in London."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 October 2007 9:28 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
2
1

David Gould,

25/10/2007 09:35:26
Yes, our locomotive was built in 1965, but is maintained by people who work for other rail operators elsewhere. The carriages used are 1980s carriages that are used extensively elsewhere on the network. The locomotive is much more environmentally friendly that the Pioneer sets Hull Trains currently being used elsewhere.
2

Tony Miles,

Manchester - Modern Railways Magazine 25/10/2007 17:56:03
The above story is riddled with more errors than I can count. The fully overhauled 1965 locomotive being used by Hull trains is for 4 trains a week for around three months until a 125mph train of around 6 years vintage is introduced as soon as it becomes available. National Express isn't taking on ANY 110mph diesel trains - but some 110mph ELECTRICs built around 1990 and as used by 'one' railway. The other electric trains which NXEC will inherit have been fully overhauled by GNER in the last few years and the East Coast electric trains are the lost reliable Inter-City type trains in the UK now. If this is the accuracy of your reporting I feel very sorry for the readers of your paper.
3

swog,

26/10/2007 10:16:07
Excuse me, but if you read the national express comments I think you'll find the story is spot on.
4

Paul Bigland,

London 26/10/2007 10:30:04
The story is far from 'spot on'. The quote from National Express is used out of context. But it is a very good example of how to inject negativity into a positive story (more trains). Getting the facts wrong doesn't help either. There are no 110mph diesel trains, the plan is to use the same type of coaches used in the GNER diesel trains, but with electric locomotives built in 1989-90. So, this is either poorly researched journalism, or being cavalier with the facts.
5

swog,

leeds 26/10/2007 11:29:29
Oh give me a break.the national express quote couldn't be clearer and you're missing the point Yet again rail firms are being forced into an impossible situation by a lack of general investment and no doubt it will be the passengers who will pay with delays and ultimately higher fares to pay for services.
6

Paul Bigland,

London 26/10/2007 13:02:27
The facts of the story are wrong on a number of counts. The National Express ' quote' could be MUCH clearer - as it's being taken to refer to one type of train, when the reality is it can only refer to the existing GNER HST's - which are being fitted with new engines. There are no 'diesel locomotives with a top speed of 110mph' - but there are electric ones. So the report that the 'new' locomotives are less 'green' is rubbish. The point is that it seems beyond the paper to get simple facts right (type of trains, age of trains), which means that people are being misled, and the headline of Yorkshire becoming a 'rail museum' is completly wrong, as the new coaches National Express will be using are newer (although the same design) than the ones GNER are currently using in their HSTs! .
7

Alasdair Mulhern,

26/10/2007 17:58:50
Since when have the Class 90 ELECTRIC locomotives which will actually be joining the ECML fleet been labelled as 'vintage'? Worth pointing out I guess that they are no more polluting or older than the Class 91 electric locomotives. I read that the use of Mk3 rolling stock is seen as providing passengers with a less safe level of service, how exactly? do you really think the HST sets would be working across the country at 125mph if they were potentially unsafe? Also, a note to any newspaper journalist who reads this, please stop referring to any rolling stock vehicle or a multiple unit car (although I guess possessing that sort of knowledge is beyond you) as a locomotive. Oh yeah, the use of older diesel HST sets will also be increasing once the new Cross Country franchise gets underway
8

swog,

leeds 26/10/2007 18:49:33
oh yes, i see. I presumed when he said "the trains are diesel, yes" he meant the trains are diesel. so easy to misunderstand, only speaking english and not train.
9

PRB,

London 26/10/2007 18:56:29
This is really a shameful piece of "journalism" just in terms of the errors contained in it, never mind the chippy bias. London already subsidises the rest of the country to the tune of between £13bn and £20bn per annum. The "new trains everywhere" "down in London" were long-overdue, replacing rolling stock that was 40-50 years old (much younger than the fleet that Yorkshire is moaning about), and the Thameslink Programme is a £3.5bn upgrade of an old line, not a new line as YP incorrectly notes. Only £5.2bn of the total £16bn cost of Crossrail is coming from the Government (to whom Londoners pay significant amounts of tax already) with the rest being paid for by increased taxes on London businesses and increased fares (Yorkshire please note a cash fare to travel one stop on the Underground in Zone 1, with no chance of a seat, is already £4 - compare that with a standard day single costing £2.50 to get from Bradford to Leeds!). £8.7bn of central Government expenditure for the period to 2017 when Crossrail will open is far less than the total money that the regions leech from London each year so the grudging tones are hardly justified, even less so when one takes into account how the resultant increase in productivity will mean that Londoners will pay more tax for the regions to snaffle. First get the facts right, and second stop moaning, you're not so hard done by!
10

Richard D,

UK 27/10/2007 00:18:24
I'm intrigued by this - it's a well-known fact that National Express are introducing Class 90s, built circa 1989, on *additional* services on the ECML - but this article mentions 110mph diesel locomotives. It's also worth pointing out that two TOCs who operate in Yorkshire, Transpennine Express and Virgin Cross Country, have completely replaced their fleets of trains since 2006 and 2001 respectively, so the region has seen plenty of investment in new rolling stock. With such incredibly sloppy journalism skills, Mr Smithard would be better off sticking to politics!
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.