MPs call for vote on potential US trade deal as agreement edges closer
The Country Land and Business Association said it would be “morally bankrupt” to lower food standards in pursuit of an agreement with Donald Trump’s White House.
Reports have suggested that some sort of economic partnership with the US could be announced within weeks, which Sir Keir Starmer hopes will reduce tariffs on British exports.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdEarlier in the week Vice President JD Vance said there was a “good chance” of the UK and US reaching a “great” trade agreement, which was in the “best interest of both countries”.
During Mr Trump’s first term, a free-trade agreement was proposed with Britain which would have included allowing chicken treated in chlorine and hormone-fed beef access to the UK market.
This was highly controversial with farmers, who have long argued that giving other countries with lower safety standards and cheaper food production simply damages British agriculture and food security.


Trade experts have told The Yorkshire Post that any US proposition will almost certainly include hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdBusiness Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said recently: “We will never change our SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) food standards.
“We've made that perfectly clear to the United States.”
However, Mr Reynolds added that there were some areas where US food standards aligned, which could be part of any agreement.
CLA Director North, Harriet Ranson, said: “Whilst there are positives for the UK economy from a trade deal with the United States, this must not come at the expense of our farming sector and the safe, affordable food they produce.
“A deal which allows not only hormone-treated beef - banned due to its risk to human health - but also chlorinated chicken to enter the UK is morally bankrupt given both practices are banned here.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“There is no need to mask poor poultry hygiene practices here due to our higher standards of animal welfare throughout production.
“It would be prudent for any government to engage and listen to all sectors that may be impacted by any future trade deals.
“The Government must be as committed to the future of British farming as it has proven itself to be for our steel workers.”
The Liberal Democrats have consistently been calling for Parliament to be given a vote on any proposed trade deal, and have now got backing from senior Labour MPs.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHarrogate and Knaresborough Lib Dem MP Tom Gordon told The Yorkshire Post: “The public expect MPs and Parliamentarians to be debating any trade deal, and be given a vote on that agreement.
“We know broadly speaking that people aren’t happy to sacrifice children’s online safety or farming standards, we shouldn’t be bartering away these rights just to get some tokenistic deal.
“I’m not confident at all that food standards won’t be on the negotiating table.”
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.