Two flaws in Grant Shapps defence of £96bn Integrated Rail Plan – The Yorkshire Post says


This is significant in the context of today’s piece by Grant Shapps on the £96bn Integrated Rail Plan – it is passionate, punchy and also very political.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHistory will judge if the London Government’s decision to break its promises to the region and downgrade both HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail is the correct call – and the Transport Secretary will have left office long before then.


Yet, while readers of The Yorkshire Post will have their own views on the merits of the arguments, two of his assertions should not pass unchallenged.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdFirst, Mr Shapps writes that the IRP includes “a new mass transit system for West Yorkshire”. It does not. It confirms that there’s now £200m available for a feasibility study.


Yet the Minister’s own policy document notes that “the cost for the initial network, over 10 years, is expected to exceed £2bn”.
Second, the Minister justifies the decision not to build Northern Powerhouse Rail through Bradford by highlighting communities like Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Wakefield and Doncaster that will benefit as a result.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe is, of course, entitled to his view, but Baroness Vere, one of his own junior ministers, did confirm to the House of Lords last week that the DfT does not know how many extra trains will be able to run on a network already operating at full capacity in Leeds.
Moving forward, this newspaper, for one, looks forward to Mr Shapps being candid on this oversight if he expects commuters here to still trust him.
Support The Yorkshire Post and become a subscriber today. Your subscription will help us to continue to bring quality news to the people of Yorkshire. In return, you’ll see fewer ads on site, get free access to our app, receive exclusive members-only offers and access to all premium content and columns. Click here to subscribe.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.